My Question: Whose land is it: Palestine or Israel?

 

  • Experiment with researching a topic using the tool, and comparing the results to those of Google Scholar or a Library search?
    • Chat GPT 
      • Objective opinion with no citations or even references 
    • Perplexity 
      • Objective opinion with academic articles and references 
    • Scite 
      • Objective opinion with academic articles and references; however, it  Generated an article that does not exist.
    • Scispace 
      • It provides an unclear objective opinion with some unreachable resources, some old sources, and a 1-2 credible and objective opinion.  
    • Google Scholar 
      • It provides various credible studies (most of them are against Palestine colonization)  
    • In comparison, Google Scholar provides many articles of multiple opinions which gives the ability reader to choose and analyze the articles themselves, while the AI engines give a tailored opinion to the questionnaire. 
  • Did you find similar sources?
    • Actually, I did not find any similar sources neither among AI tools nor Google Scholar articles. 
  •  Did you find different quality sources?
    • Yes, I found different validities of sources such as nontrusted institutions of related podcasts, social media sources ”Qoura”, and some governmental and trusted sources.  
  •  What are the pros and cons of the tool?
    • Pros 
      • Fast way of reaching information, able to simplify the information provided, and gives relevant information to the topic provided 
    • Cons
      • Most of the time, it is not accurate as many AI tools generate or make up sources that do not even exist, it may be biased sometimes, and it is able to spread agendas or information that the owners of AI institutions want you to know.
  • Experiment with using the tool to summarize or help you ask questions about an article how good is the summary?
    • There are 2 situations for this process. 
      • 1: Asking for a normal summary: it provides a general summary of the given information while missing important details and information regarding the article 
      • 2: Asking for a detailed summary stating (do not miss any important information): It provides a full summary of the information while stating the main and sub points in the same order as described in the original article.

 

    •  What does it miss or confuse?
      • Situation 1 
        • It misses a lot of essential information which may affect the user’s full understanding.
  • Experiment with any other features of the tool (each tool has different strengths) – what would you use?
    • SCISPACE 
      • Has the ability to find sources for various topics and integrate a beneficial overview of the article which makes it easier for the user to choose and find the sources needed.
  • Scite 
    • Has a Search Strategy option which is able to search for multiple keywords related to the topic from your assigned questing, which makes it search for many sources with multiple institutions that may decrease the concept of giving biased articles and opinions.
  • Compare the search and summary function to either ChatGPT or Gemini in terms of quality of sources and ease of use. 
    • ChatGPT in terms of searching for valuable sources is very weak as it does not always include real or trusted sources; however, it is the most simple interface among all AI engines.

SCITE

CHATGPT

PERPLEXITY

SCISPACE